Ivey Must Wait on Borgata Appeal

A federal court has ruled that poker pro Phil Ivey must wait to file an appeal of the $10 million judgment against him in a case brought by the Borgata casino in Atlantic City. The case involved edge sorting at a baccarat table, and the court ruled Ivey must wait until another suit—brought by Borgata against the card manufacturer—must be settled before he can appeal.

Poker player Phil Ivey will not be able to appeal his losing judgment in a suit with the Borgata Casino in Atlantic City until another case related to his edge-sorting at a baccarat table is settled.

U.S. District Court Judge Noel Hillman ruled that Ivey can’t appeal until Borgata concludes a similar case against the card manufacturer. The case stems from 2012 where Ivey and a partner exploited a defect in the cards used at a Borgata and also exploited “edge-sorting” techniques to win several million.

Borgata took the case to court and eventually won a $10 million judgment. Ivey, however, maintains that he never cheated and simply exploited flaws in the deck the casino should have noted.

Borgata has also filed a suit against Gemaco, the card manufacturer. The judge ruled that Borgata should resolve all its suits stemming from the incident before appeals can be heard.